Photo of humanzee?
In Part 1 I posted about recent claims by Dr. Gordon Gallup that in the late 1920s a primate lab in Florida impregnated a female chimp with human male sperm and that the result was a living human-chimp hybrid. Due to moral concerns and the religious attitude of the US at that time and because of several moral questions the scientists involved in that endeavor terminated the infant a few weeks after it was born. I also posted about Soviet leader Josef Stalin’s program to create a human-ape hybrid under the direction of Dr Ilya Ivanov and that we still don’t know for certain if that program was successful or not. In this post I will address some of the “logistics” involved in creating hybrids in general and specifically human-ape hybrids.
Ape-Human Chromosome Comparison Chart
In the above graphic we see the chromosome comparisons of Orangutans, Gorillas, Chimps, and Humans. As you can see there are many similarities but there are also some differences. The similarities are due to humans and apes sharing a common ancestor about 7 mya (million years ago). As we diverged from that common ancestor some of our chromosomes changed as did those of the other primates so there are still similarities we share but there are some differences too. Continue Reading
Here’s an email I received recently:
“Dr Peron I’ve noticed that you’ve made a few comments on your blog centering around the possibility that some “human” fossil remains may not be human at all but may be the remains of now extinct prehistoric apes. I think one reason they are considered “ancient human ancestors” is because they are suspected of having been bipedal (correct me if I’m wrong) and the general thinking is that only humans are bipedal. Could you elaborate on this a bit in one of your posts please? I’m assuming your comments refer to species such as Ardipithecus, Paranthropus, Australopithecus, and maybe even Homo habilis? Thank you….”
And here is my response:
Thank you for your email and interest in my blog. Regarding your question(s) let me begin with the recent discovery in Germany of what appears to be the fossil remains of Australopithecus which is HIGHLY significant because this species of hominin is unknown outside of Africa. Yet, there is the fossil evidence in Germany! Or is it?
The ink on the report detailing the discovery wasn’t even dry before a measured campaign was launched to discredit the discovery! National Geographic appears to have led the charge claiming that the fossil remains were not those of Australopithecus at all but were the remains of some unknown prehistoric European ape that may have been partially bipedal. I’m NOT seeing any EVIDENCE for this, frankly, and believe that NG initiated a cover-up IN PROGRESS!! And why should they and their cohorts do so? Because if these German remains are indeed Australopithecus then that “fries” the OOA theory, period!!
So are these remains that of an ancient human ancestor or some unknown prehistoric European ape? Who knows and we will likely NEVER know now. From what I know of the discovery in my mind everything points to the fossil remains being those of a European Australopithecus NOT an ape. But, then again, what was Australopithecus? Think about the famous “Lucy” who was one of these species. She had all the features of an ape but she appears to have been at least partially if not fully bipedal. So either she was an early human ancestor OR she was a BIPEDAL APE! When I compare her remains to ape remains I see many similarities and, frankly, very few similarities to humans. Human or ape? Ape or woman?
When I do comparisons of various fossil remains I find the same. That is, many APE features and FEW human features. So have we got our fossils mixed up? Are some of the fossils of AHA really those of unknown prehistoric apes and not human at all? I’m NOT altogether convinced that every bipedal hominin is an AHA! In fact, they may well have been bipedal prehistoric APES and not human at all. I’m still doing comparisons and still pondering on this subject so I haven’t decided yet. However, I DO think we’ve got some of our fossils mixed up and misidentified!! And I think the remains found in Germany are PROBABLY the remains of Australopithecus and NOT an ape at all….or should I say a “bipedal German ape?”.
Additionally, on another but related subject I’m also trying to figure out why LATER Homo erectus was more archaic that EARLIER H. erectus as famed Paleoanthropologist Dr John Hawks has pointed out more than once. I suspect the devolution is due to backbreeding with a more archaic hominin species of some sort OR perhaps early H. erectus was a hybrid produced from interbreeding with a more modern species? I’ll let you know what I conclude and also what I conclude about these “human” or ape “AHA” skulls….Man or Ape?.
A paper that came out in September 2017 by Professor Ulfur Arnason calls for a new paradigm and it’s making some waves. Professor Arnason is a neuroscientist at the University of Lund in Sweden and in the paper he places the LAST COMMON ANCESTOR of Homo sapiens sapiens (modern humans) and the Neanderthals somewhere in EURASIA, not Africa. Professor Arnason argues that the ancesotrs of the African KhoeSan and Mbuti people formed the first exodus of modern humans INTO AFRICA out of ASIA AND EUROPE. If he’s right then his research calls the Out of Africa theory (OOA) into question, once again, as so much research is now doing but it’s all being ignored, summarily!
A simplified view of Hss migrations. The shaded area signifies an undefined Asian(Eurasian) area from which Hss dispersed. The red track shows the potential routes of KhoeSan, Mbuti and Yoruba outside the Hsnn range. KhoeSan and Mbuti may have diverged before their migration into Africa. The arrow-headed lines between Mbuti and Yoruba mark potential genetic exchange. The green track represents the common Asian origin of indigenous Australians, Papuans-New Guineans and the Andamanese (Mallick et al., 2016). Altai shows the location of the genetic contribution of Hss into Hsn (Kuhlwilm et al., 2016) and Daoxian Cave the location of the palaeontological Hss finds described by Liu et al. (2015). Image credit: Úlfur Árnason
Common belief is that the ancient human ancestors of modern humans lived somewhere in Africa and Homo sapiens evolved there first and migrated out of Africa to Europe and Asia. Most scientists hold the belief that the exact dating of this emergence out of Africa of our ancient ancestors remains to be resolved but they are ever so sure they will discover a date soon. However, the research of Professor Arnason suggests that the origination of Homo sapiens sapiens was in EURASIA NOT IN AFRICA!
Neanderthals and modern humans seem to have parted ways, at least genetically, sometime before 500 kya (thousand years ago). Arnason argues that this date places the first of our species somewhere in Eurasia and he adds this to what we know about the geographical range of Neanderthals.
Professor Arnason said, “The EXCLUSIVE occurrence of Neanderthals in EUROPE and ASIA and their ABSENCE from Africa restricts their origins to EURASIA,” and indeed it DOES! He went on to also say, “As a consequence, the origin of their sister-group (Homo sapiens sapiens; modern humans) should be placed in the SAME CONTINENT (ie: EURASIA).” He goes on saying that this hypothesis would then be in “compliance with the LCA (last common ancestor) understanding that the LCS of any two sister groups CANNOT be separated, neither in time nor space.” Amen to that!! Continue Reading
The CDC has put something interesting out lately pertaining to heat related deaths. According to their data about 600 Americans die every year due to heat related causes. In contrast, double that amount of Americans die due to COLD related causes. The CDC estimates are noted below.
Here’s something else. The planets temp has risen 1 degree in the last 100 years and life expectancy has doubled in the last 100 years. So is heating bad? Likely not. And one other little item……..cold seems to love diseases while heat tend to kill them. So the colder it is, the more disease is likely, while the warmer it is, the less likely disease outbreak is.
Make of the CDC statistics what you will but one thing I see for sure is that cold is much more dangerous to human life than warmth. And what would happen to much of human life should Earth suddenly plunge into a new ice age? I think we can safely say that there would be a lot of death due to disease outbreak, exposure, and famine. Continue Reading
Maka woman in Pacific Northwest from 1900
In a recent post to his webpage Linguist Robert Lindsay makes two important observations (among others). In the final paragraph he notes how the Mozabite people in Algeria are Caucasoid but they are “some of the weirdest-looking Caucasoids I have ever seen. They don’t really look like any other race of humans..” He notes some look like people from India. He also notes that in papers about the genesis of the Caucasian race North Africa, the Middle East, and India are mentioned (frequently) as hubs for the development of this race 30-40 kya. He further notes that the Mozabite people are mentioned over and over when remains of ancient genetic groups are discussed along with the Uighur “for some odd reason.” I think this is because some researchers consider the Mozabites and Uighur to be some of the most ancient people on the planet.
This is subject matter for a future post I think but for now I want to focus on something else Lindsay said in this post. He notes, “There are also links between Orcadians (Scottish Islanders) and Siberians.” This is true and has been acknowledged by some researchers. Then Lindsay goes on to say this:
“Skulls from Europe from 21,000 YBP (years before present) look more like Amerindians than anything else. The closest match-up between those ancient European skulls is the Makah Amerindian tribe from Europe.”
Now the Makah are actually a Native American tribe currently dwelling in Washington State in the Pacific Northwest of the US. They are a federally recognized tribe. These people have hunted whales and seals for generations. So I’m not sure what Lindsay means by saying the Makah “tribe from Europe” because most anthropologist believe these people came via the Beringia Landbridge into North America and never were in Europe. However, skulls of SOME Europe from around 21 kya DO in fact resemble Amerindian skulls!
In 2007 there was a find and DNA analysis that undercut recent theories about Paleoamericans (the first people in the New World) having originally come from SE Asia or even Europe. That find was the “Cave Maiden.” These remains were of a teenage girl found in a Mexican cave who lived about 12 kya. The cave is the Outland Cave in the Yucatan. Her bones are believed to be one of the oldest and most complete skeletons ever found in the Americas. DNA analysis showed her ancestry was from a now vanished land between Siberia and Alaska. Continue Reading
Artistic depiction of the 5 Dmanisi skulls
The majority consensus is that our ancient human ancestors came out of Africa and populated the world. And the consensus is also that human evolution took place in Africa as these newly evolved humans migrated out of Africa they replaced more archaic species along the way. This is the OOA/Replacement Theory. More recently there has been evidence found that, in fact, there were not only migrations out of Africa but also back into Africa. However, there is a growing body of evidence suggesting all of this is NOT the case at all and part of that growing evidence are the finds at the Dmanisi site in Georgia (Russia).
The finds at the Dmanisi site clearly challenge the conventional opinion and the more we find the more it is beginning to appear that Africa was NOT the sole “cradle of humankind.” For, what is being found at the Dmanisi site suggests STRONGLY that there was a “Eurasian chapter in the long evolutionary story of man.”
Location of Dmanisi site in Georgia Republic
The Dmanisi discoveries upset the conventional view that ancient human ancestors migrated out of Africa not so long ago in evolutionary terms. In fact, these discoveries strongly point to ancient human ancestors migrating out of Africa FAR earlier than the conventional view holds. Of course, some of this is being demeaned by the suggestion (speculation) that there was simply a long evolutionary interlude in Eurasia before moving back into Africa to complete our evolution. Frankly, I think that is an absolute CROCK! I think what was going on at Dmanisi was far MORE than simply an “evolutionary interlude.”
The Dmanisi fossilized bones have been dated at around 1.8 myr and they are the oldest remains discovered outside of Africa to date. The Dmanisi remains are far more primitive appearing than Homo erectus which is believed to have been the first hominid species to migrate out of Africa about 1 mya. How is this possible that we have a hominid species outside of Africa long before H. erectus migrated out of Africa and began their conquest of the world?
When we compare the Dmanisi remains to H. erectus remains we come up with some very interesting comparisons. The Dmanisi had brains about 40% SMALLER than the average H. erectus brain! We also find that the Dmanisi were significantly shorter than the average H. erectus. Further, the conventional view has been that when H. erectus came out of Africa they had sophisticated stone tools (Acheulean) and that their physical anatomy was “advanced” in terms of brain size and limb proportions. BUT what is found at Dmanisi is very DIFFERENT from this! Continue Reading
Patagonia is a region at the southern end of Argentina and Chile in South America. It contains the southern end of the Andes and the desert steppes and grasslands east of this mountain range. It is bounded by both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
Lake Pehoe, Patagonia
The name “Patagonia” has a rather interesting meaning. This region was named by the famous navigator and explorer Magellan in 1520. “Patagonia” is derived from the word “patagon.” Magellan used this name to describe the people that he and his men thought were “giants”! Most historians believe that the people he was referring to were the Tehuelches who just happened to be a a bit taller than your average European at the time. The name of these people, Tehuelches, actually means “the fierce people” in their native tongue.
When the Spanish explorers first set foot in this area they came across some rather large footprints on the beaches and they thought them to have been made by giants. But, actually, the footprints were made by the Tehuelches leather boots (called “guanaco”) which they wore on their feet. But the rumors persisted and this land of Patagonia gained the reputation of being a “land of giants.”
Tehuelche Chieftains in Patagonia, Argentina
The Tehuelches have lived in the Patagonia area for over 14,500 years. This claim has been verified by archaeological discoveries and research. These people have a nomadic lifestyle so archaeological evidence has been rather scant. They are also hunter-gatherers and they are rather well known for their cave paintings. One thing I find interesting about these people is that they are similar in appearance to the Hopi of northeastern Arizona and other Pueblo people of the American Southwest although taller.
It seems that throughout Patagonia’s history there have been stories or legends of hairy giants and ogres (man-eating giants). Some people have speculated that Patagonia might have been the home of some surviving Homo erectus hominids. This is used by some to explain the many sightings of an alleged Patagonian Bigfoot which has been reported since the time of the Spanish Conquistadors in the region. This explanation is rather interesting because mainstream anthropology says H. erectus was never in the Americas. But, as researcher Austin Whittall of Argentina says there is some controversial evidence that has been found in the area that is ignored by mainstream archaeology yet this evidence suggests humans were in the Americas long before we suspect. In fact, roughly 1/4 of a million years ago! Continue Reading
There’s an interesting article at the link below on Climate and Global Warming pointing out some rather interesting facts about the REAL AGENDA behind it all. I gather from reading the comments quoted in the article that when they are speaking of “climate” they are not speaking of climate in terms of weather but in changing the POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CLIMATE. Wow! Now I finally get it!
Some of the more interesting quotes include:
From UN Top Climate Official Christiana Figueres who says it’s (global warming) NOT about the climate but about redistribution of wealth and the destruction of capitalism, one world government, and economic control. What a sham!! The UN is up to its old tricks dreaming about itself being that one world government. Why am I not surprised?
From Papal adviser Naomi Klein who says global warming is about anti-capitalism and has nothing to do with science. This statement is nothing short of OUTRAGEOUS!
Lead author of the IPCC’s 4th Assessment Report in 2007 Mr Ottmar Edenhofer said climate change policy is about how redistribute global wealth. Unbelievable!
Go to the link below to read some more of these outrageous statements and be sure to read the comments as some of them are rather enlightening too. What I’ll say about this is that science has most definitely been hijacked and politicized. And that is why we have so much FAKE SCIENCE today! It’s NOT about science at all but is about politics and funding. Truth has been thrown into the garbage! Scientific fact has been thrown into the sewer! The USA needs to leave the UN and take our money with us ASAP and boot their sorry butts out of the country! I believe the UN is one of the most corrupt organizations on the planet and it is obviously USA.
As your reading these revelations keep in mind things like Climategate, NOAA and NASA getting caught lying about temps in central Africa, and on and on. Global warming has already been exposed as a fraud. So why are we continuing to believe it? Don’t answer as I already know the answer is, sadly, most of the people on this planet are either misinformed greatly or not informed at all.
Hey….I get it now….when they speak of “climate change” they are talking about political and economic climate change not environment.