A new look at archaic human DNA by the University of Utah has come to some interesting and “revolutionary” findings but sadly what they have found doesn’t fit at all with the status quo so it’s being ignored. However, I STRONGLY suspect that what the U of U has found is closer to the TRUTH in terms of the human evolution story than what we have now!
Using a new method for analyzing DNA sequence data researchers at the University of Utah have reconstructed the early history of archaic humans and it contradicts what we believe to be so for modern humans (H. sapiens), Neanderthals, and Denisovans. One thing they discovered quickly was that Neanderthal and Denisovan populations almost went extinct but 300 generations later the Neanderthal population grew to TENS OF THOUSANDS of individuals living in segregated populations, that is, they mainly lived apart from Denisovans and modern humans.
“This hypothesis is against conventional wisdom, but IT MAKES MORE SENSE that the conventional wisdom,” said Alan Rogers who is a professor of Anthropology and lead author of the study. And indeed it does!! The conventional wisdom holds the view that Neanderthal numbers were small when modern humans came upon the scene…somewhere around 1000 individuals. But this study shows that that number grossly underestimates the Neanderthal population at the time. The team calculated that Neanderthals and Denisovans separated around 744 kya which is much earlier than conventional wisdom holds. The study also questions the conventional wisdom that Neanderthal populations only amounted to about 1000 individuals and that the REAL Neanderthal population may have numbered in the tens of thousands!! Continue Reading
H/T to JR Bentley for alerting us to this HIGHLY SIGNIFICANT discovery in Australia:
Archaeologists in Australia have discovered the oldest stone axes with a ground edge on the planet! This discovery is very important because it sets back Australia’s human history to 65,000 years! That’s about 18,000 years earlier than thought. Further this date directly challenges the OOA (Out of Africa/Replacement Theory) along with theorized migration timelines and human evolution!
The archaeological team was excavating artifacts at the rock shelter known as “Madjedbebe” near the Kakadu National Park which is located about 300 km east of Darwin. The Madjedbebe is a rock shelter that sits atop the base of the Amhem land escarpment on a sandy plain. A number of artifacts were discovered by the team including the world’s oldest ground-edge axe head made by grinding rather than flaking. Chris Clarkson of the University of Queensland heads the team and research. He told reporters, “The site contains the oldest ground -edge stone axe technology in the world, the oldest known seed grinding tools in Australia and evidence of finely made stone points which may have served as spear tips.”
(left) Axes & Grinding stones found at site; (right) edge ground hand axe found at site
There are in fact many scientists who believe Madjedbebe is home of the earliest evidence of humans in Australia. This discovery has “universal importance” for the human evolution and for Australia’s native people as well as for Continue Reading
H/T to JR Bentley for providing this link 🙂
“Uh Oh, The paradigm is shifting again… New find from Fels Cave. A MAMMOTH IVORY ROPE MAKER! More importantly it is a four strand rope maker unlike even the modern Rope, Wire Rope and Cable makers that are a standard three strands! A four strand Rope would have been by physical nature not only stronger, but much more flexible and actually easier to hold varied knotting patterns! I hope they are right on this… Shows a whole world of difference in assumed Cognitive abilities… If true, this is huge!”
JR Bentley is absolutely right! The paradigm IS changing and more and more it is changing rapidly. This latest find at Hohle Fels Cave in Germany is amazing and it changes everything we THOUGHT we knew about rope making and our ancestors. Apparently, they were making 4 strand rope 42 kya and would have been a very strong rope indeed. I have a 4 strand rope from a ship and over the years I’ve used it for a variety of things, even pulling trucks bigger than my own! And that rope is still as good as new! So our ancestors in Germany were making 4 strand ropes using ivory technology and the question is what were they using such a strong robe for?
Ivory rope maker tools found in Germany
The tool used to make these 4 strand robes is carved from ivory. Four small holes were placed close together on an 8 inch long strip of mammoth ivory. What is even MORE fascinating is that the maker of the tools intricately carved a spiral pattern in the holes much like the spiral patter we see today inside a modern gun barrel. Continue Reading
And it is beginning to appear that it was FREQUENT and not rare!!
Archaic admixture with modern humans is believed to have take place via interbreeding between modern humans
Dali Man Skull, China
and archaic humans such as Neanderthals, Denisovans, and possibly others. And I would certainly add Homo erectus.
Neanderthal DNA accounts for between 1-4% of the Eurasian genome in modern humans. However, this admixture is uncommon or nonexistent in the genomes of Sub-Saharan Africans. In Oceanians, Southeast Asians we find Denisovan DNA admixture. In Melanesian people we find 4-6% Denisovan DNA in their genomes.
African populations have a genetic contribution from a now extinct archaic African hominin in their genomes. Fossils, especially ancient human ancestor fossils, are rare because certain conditions must be present for fossils to form. Most species that die simply rot but every now and then the conditions are right and fossils form. In African environments there is a rapid decay of fossils and this makes it very difficult to compare modern human admixture to archaic African hominins such as H. ergaster and H. habilis et al. Further, about 2% genetic material found in some Sub-Saharan African populations entered the human genome about 35-40 kya. This was added by interbreeding with archaic human species (ancient human ancestors). Evidence for this suggests that this interbreeding mostly took place in CENTRAL Africa and NOT Eastern Africa as we would expect! In terms of geologic time 35-40 kya is NOT a long time. Continue Reading
Neanderthal-Modern Human comparison
New research conducted by Australian National University and the University of Sidney is providing a new window into the transition between Neanderthals to H. sapiens. Excavating in a cave in the Moravian region of the Czech Republic researchers have developed a timeline of evidence from 10 sediment layers spanning 28-50 kya. This is the period when it is generally believed that modern human ancestors first arrived in Europe.
20,000 animal bones have been recovered at the site along with stone tools, weapons, and an engraved bone bead believed to be the oldest of its kind every found in Central Europe. Dr. Duncan Wright (ANU) believes this project is highly important because it is providing some evidence for modern human activity in the area. During this time modern human ancestors were moving into the area and, I think, interbreeding with Neanderthals at least to some extent. Continue Reading
So the most recent analysis of H. naledi found in South Africa puts this species as coexisting with modern humans. Why am I not hearing anything about attempts to gather DNA from some of these fossils? Surely if this species is so recent then there will be viable DNA. Just a question I’m throwing out there for your consideration.
“Neo” (Homo naledi)
Irhoud Skull 1 notice the large brow ridge
In 1961 the bones & skeleton were determined to be Neanderthal hunters. Neanderthals are not Homo sapiens, however. “the oldest Homo sapiens ever found in Africa or elsewhere.” Seriously? But Neanderthals are not H. sapiens! Of course after the OOA was debunked last month with the discovery of a Neanderthal ancestor in Spain I suppose they had to come up with something (anything) to place the OOA back on it throne? So I take it that now we class Neanderthals as H. sapiens? And what about that little 3% Neanderthal DNA in modern humans? Sticky little point, no? Oh yes and something had to be done to dethrone the recent find near San Diego in the Americas too 🙂
“It’s the face of people you cross in the street today…” really? You mean back in 1961 they couldn’t tell the difference between a Neanderthal face and a H. sapien face?
“….the 300,000-year-old braincases—the part of the skull that houses the brain—are elongated in shape and accommodate a larger cerebellum…” Homo erectus had an elongated skull but I notice this is not mentioned at all and some had brains as big or slightly bigger than ours!
So are we now to date modern humans at 300 kyr rather than 200 kyr? Are we to now include Neanderthals as H. sapiens? I’m willing to bet they found some sort of Neanderthal-Erectus hybrid but they aren’t about to admit that for God’s sake!!! Continue Reading